Category: Science

  • From Aryabhata to Chandrayaan 3: the Amazing story of ISRO

    From Aryabhata to Chandrayaan 3: the Amazing story of ISRO

    Introduction 

    The Indian Space Research Organisation (ISRO) is India’s national space agency. Formerly known as the Indian National Committee for Space Research (INCOSPAR), ISRO serves as the principal research and development arm of the Department of Space, Government of India. ISRO’s main functions include space-based operations, space exploration, international space cooperation, and the development of related technologies. It also has a constellation of imaging, communications, and remote sensing satellites. By August 2025, ISRO will have sent 3 missions to the moon and 1 mission to Mars.

    Chapter 1: INCOSPAR Days

    The concept of an Indian Space Agency was the brainchild of Dr. Vikram Ambalal Sarabhai, who is considered the Father of the Indian Space Program. INCOSPAR was formed in 1962 by the Department of Atomic Energy. Dr. Homi Jehangir Bhabha, widely regarded as the Father of the Indian Nuclear Program, supported Dr. Sarabhai in building the first rocket launching station in India. The centre was at Thumpa, near Thiruvananthapuram, on the coast of the Arabian Sea. The first rocket was launched on November 21, 1963, with a sodium vapour payload.

    On January 1st, 1967, the Satellite Telecommunication Earth Station was established in Ahmedabad, Gujarat, India, thus laying the foundation stone for future satellite launching missions. INCOSPAR was finally upgraded to ISRO on August 15, 1969, under the Department of Atomic Energy(DAE).

    Chapter 2:  ISRO and Its Missions’ History

    ISRO was initially under DAE, but on June 1, 1972, the Space Commission and the Department of Space (DoS) were set up, and ISRO was brought under its management.

    In its initial days, ISRO launched various missions, including the Satellite Instructional Television Experiment (SITE) in collaboration with NASA on 1st January, 1975. The project made available informational television programs to rural India. The main objectives of the experiment were to educate the financially backward and academically illiterate people of India on various issues via satellite broadcasting, and also to help India gain technical experience in the field of satellite communications.

    An important event in Indian history was the launch of India’s first satellite, Aryabhata (named after the Indian mathematician and astronomer of 500 CE) on 19th April, 1975. It was designed and fabricated by ISRO and was launched by a Soviet Kosmos-3M rocket from Kapustin Yar.

    Other important missions in the early years include the launch of satellites like Bhaskara I (1979), Rohini Satellite RS-1(1980), INSAT 2B(1983), INSAT 1C(1988), INSAT 1D(1990), etc., and the Satellite Telecommunication Experiments Project of 1977. 

    On 2nd April 1984,  Wing Commander Rakesh Sharma became the first Indian to go to space though a India-Soviet manned space mission in a Soyuz T-11 rocket on an eight-day mission to the Salyut 7 space station. This joint mission was a result of an agreement between ISRO and the Soviet Intercosmos program.

    At present, ISRO has accomplished and is undergoing  missions including-

    • 132 spacecraft missions 
    • 18 Satellites realised by private players or students
    • 433 Foreign satellites launched by ISRO
    • 102 Launch Missions
    • 9 Re-entry Missions & POEMS
    • 2 Launch missions facilitated by ISRO
    • 1 Gaganyaan (manned mission)

    Chapter 3: Chandrayaan- A journey to the Moon

    ISRO has thus far completed three lunar missions called the Chandrayaan Programme.

    Chandrayaan 1 was India’s first mission to the moon. It was launched on October 22, 2008, from Satish Dhawan Space Centre, Sriharikota. It orbited around the moon at a height of 100 km from the surface for chemical, minerals, and photo-geological mapping of the moon. It carried 11 pieces of scientific equipment from India, the USA, the UK, Germany, Sweden, and Bulgaria.  After successfully orbiting for 3400 revolutions, the mission was concluded when the satellite was lost on August 29, 2008.

    Chandrayaan 2 was the second lunar mission by ISRO. It consisted of an orbiter, a lunar lander- Vikram, and a rover- Pragyan. The spacecraft was launched from Satish Dhawan Space Centre, Sriharikota, Andhra Pradesh on 22 July, 2019. It reached lunar orbit on 20 August 2019, but the lander crashed on 6 September 2019 while attempting a lunar landing due to a software error. The orbiter continues to operate in orbit around the moon.

    Chandrayaan 3 was launched on July 24, 2023, from Sriharikota and reached lunar orbit on 5th August, 2024. The mission consisted of a lander- Vikram, and a rover- Pragyan. It used the orbiter of Chandrayaan 2, still operating around the moon as its own orbiter. The lander successfully landed on 23rd August, 2023 at 18:04 IST and thus ISRO became the fourth national space agency to successfully land on the moon after the Soviet Space Program, NASA & CNSA. It also became the first lander to land near the moon’s south pole. The Budget of the Chandrayaan 3 mission was around Rs. 615 crore, which is around US$ 74 million, which was less than the budget of the Hollywood movie Gravity of $100 million.

    Chapter 4: Mars Orbiter Mission (MOM)

    ISRO has also completed a voyage to Mars called Mars Orbital Mission (MOM). It was launched on 5th November, 2015, from Sriharikota, making it India’s first interplanetary mission. After a 298-day-long journey to Mars, it reached the planet’s orbit on 24 September 2014. The mission carried 5 scientific payloads:- Mars Color Camera(MCC), Thermal Infrared Imaging Spectrometer (TIS), Methane Sensor for Mars (MSM), Mars Exospheric Neutral Composition Analyser (MENCA) & Lyman Alpha Photometer (LAP).

    On 2 October 2022, it was reported that the orbiter had lost communications with Earth after entering a seven-hour eclipse period in April 2022. The cost of the mission was Rs 450 crore or around US$72 million, making it the least expensive Mars mission to date.

    Chapter 5: Future Missions- Gaganyaan & NISAR

    ISRO can be said to have become a space superpower right after NASA and CNSA. It now helps other countries launch satellites and other programs. The two biggest upcoming projects of ISRO are Gaganyaan and NISAR.

    Gaganyaan aims to enable human spaceflight capability by launching a crew of 3 members to an orbit of 400km around the earth for 3 days and bringing them back safely. The rocket module will be an LVM3 rocket. The Orbital Module(OM) will be composed of a Crew Module(CM) and a Service Module(SM). CM will be the habitable space for cre,w providing an earthly environment. It is also designed to re-enter safely to the Earth’s surface. SM will assist CM by providing aids like thermal system, propulsion system, power systems, avionic systems & deployment mechanism.

    NISAR or NASA-ISRO-SAR is a Low Earth Orbit (LEO) observatory being jointly developed by NASA and ISRO. It will map the entire globe in 12 days and provide data for understanding changes in Earth’s ecosystems, ice mass, vegetation biomass, sea level rise, groundwater, and natural hazards, including earthquakes, tsunamis, volcanoes, and landslides. It consists of  L & S dual-band Synthetic Aperture Radar(SAR), which will receive large amounts of data in high resolution. Apart from respective national interests, this observatory will also help various science communities with high-quality studies, encouraging more research and development.

    Conclusion

    The journey of ISRO from the 1960s to today can be compared to a character arc of a hero’s journey. The scientific achievements from Aryabhata to Chandrayaan 3 have enabled Indian and foreign research institutes in an uncountable number of ways. The small step that was taken by Dr. Sarabhai while creating INCOSPAR later made a giant leap in Indian space research in the form of ISRO.

    That is all for this blog. Please like, comment, and share if you find this interesting. Also, subscribe to my Substack newsletter for future updates.

  • The Fascinating Rich History of Indian Mathematics

    The Fascinating Rich History of Indian Mathematics

    Introduction

    Mathematics has always been an integral part of Indian culture. From the cities of the Indus Valley Civilization like Mohenjo-Daro to the Vedic Sulbasutras to the Golden Age of Indian Mathematics (500 – 1200 CE) to the Kerala School of Mathematics, Indian culture has always given huge importance to fields of mathematics, whether arithmetic, geometry, algebra, or even trigonometry. In this blog, we will discuss India’s various contributions to mathematics, particularly in the Vedic, the Classical Age & also the later periods. The blog has intentionally been made free from equations and formulae in order to make it easier to read. I have used The Crest of the Peacock: Non-European Roots of Mathematics” by George Gheverghese Joseph as a reference for this blog post. You can also refer to my other blog on “History of Mathematics” for further references.

    Chapter 1: Ancient Indian Mathematics- The Harrappan & The Vedic Periods

    The earliest concept of mathematics in India can be traced to the Harappan or the Indus Valley Culture around 3000 BCE. Weights and Scales of various measures are found in the ruins of this Pre-Vedic Civilization. If we consider 27.584 grams of weight as a standard unit of weight, plumb bob weighing around 0.05, 0.1, 0.2, 0.5, 2, 5, 10, 20, 50, 100, 200 & 500 units were discovered from the ruins. Scales of different lengths were discovered in sites like Harappa, Mohenjo-Daro, and Lothal. The Mohenjodaro Scale has a length of 66.2 mm with nine carefully sawn, equally spaced parallel lines of 6.7056 mm each. One of the lines is marked by a hollow circle, and the sixth line from the circle is indicated by a large circular dot. The distance between the two markers is 1.32 inches(335mm), also known as the “Indus Inch”. Another important discovery is the Harappan Brick,s which had a ratio of 4:2:1 in terms of length, breadth & thickness.

    Next came the vedic age which is suggested to be roughly around 1800-800 BCE as accepted by most scholars, gets its name from the four vedas– the Rig Veda (contains hymns & prayers during rituals), the Yajur Veda (contains rules & guidance for sacrifices), the Sama Veda (have melodies in praises to the gods) & the Atharva Veda (is a collection of magical spells). Each Veda has four parts: Samhitas, Brahmanas, Aranyakas & Upanishads. A Brahmana named Satapatha Brahmana (Brahmana with a hundred paths) has one of the earliest references to mathematics in the world. The Satapatha Brahmana (~1200BCE) contains technical details of altar constructions. Details of isosceles trapezoidal altars; a circular, semi-circular, and a square altar -all three of equal areas are mentioned. Another text called Vedanga Jyotisha gave procedures for calculating time & positions of the sun & the moon in accordance with various nakshatras (zodiac signs).

    Some of the important scriptures depicting Indian Vedic Mathematics are the Sulbasutras. The Sulbasutras used instructions for two types of rituals- personal & communal. Three of the most mathematically significant Sulbasutras are those recorded by Baudhayana, Apastamba & Katyayana. The earliest of them is considered to be the Baudhayana Sulbasutra (~800 BCE), followed by the Apastamba Sulbasutra (~600 BCE) and lastly the Katyayana Sulbasutra (~200 BCE). The Baudhayana Sulbasutra states Pythagoras Theorem with an approximation procedure for obtaining the square root of 2, correct to 5 decimal places. The actual statement of the Pythagorean theorem, in terms of the sides and diagonals of squares and rectangles, is found in both the Baudhayana and the Apastamba Sulbasutras. The Sulbasutras primarily use geometric instructions for altar construction of various shapes- squares, rectangles, circles & trapeziums. Some examples include- how to turn a pair of equal or unequal squares into a third square, how to turn a rectangle into a square without changing the area, the process of squaring a circle, or circling a square. An extraordinary achievement of Vedic mathematics was the procedure of finding square roots with a high degree of approximation, like that of 2.

    The earliest types of numerals found in India are Kharosthi numerals of around 400 BCE, Brahmi numerals of around 300 BCE, and later Gwalior numerals around 850 CE. The earliest form of a symbol for zero is found in the Gwalior script of around 876 CE. In fact, the word zero comes from the Arabic al-sifr. Sifr, in turn, is a transliteration from the Sanskrit Shunya, which means void or empty. The symbol for Shunya first began as a dot or a Bindu found in India, Cambodia & Sumatra, which later became a circle.

    The rise of Jainism & Buddhism in India around 700 BCE also impacted mathematics as the use of it slowly shifted from religious to personal purposes of philosophy & inquisition. Both the Jaina and the Buddhist traditions also developed their own schools.

    The mathematics was soon integrated for astronomical works called Siddhantas. These Siddhantas contained not only an explanation of the methods involved but also a discussion of the technical instruments available then for measuring time and angles, which soon led to the Golden Age of Indian Mathematics.

    Chapter 2: Classical Indian Mathematics- The Golden Age

    The Golden Age of India, which is generally considered between 500 and 1200 CE, saw the birth of a number of “Great Indian Mathematician-Astronomers”. Some of them and their contributions are mentioned below:-

    Aryabhata I (b.476 CE):  

    Best known for his work, the Aryabhatiya, Aryabhata I was the pioneer of the Golden Age of Indian Mathematics. His work contains details of an alphabet-numeral system of notation, rules for arithmetical operations, and methods of solving simple and quadratic equations and indeterminate equations of the first degree. The book pays some attention to trigonometry and introduces the sine and versine (i.e., 1 – cosine) functions—a notable innovation on earlier work both in and outside India. He also calculated 3.1416 as a close approximation to the ratio of the circumference of a circle to its diameter. India’s first satellite, launched in 1975, was also named after him.

    Brahmagupta (b.598 CE):  

    Brahmagupta was from Ujjain, which is in the modern state of  Madhya Pradesh. He is known for his work, Brahma Sphuta-Siddhanta. It is an astronomical text with many chapters in mathematics. Brahmagupta called the twelfth chapter Ganita (Arithmetical Calculation). Although it includes a discussion of mathematical series and a few geometric topics. The eighteenth chapter, Kuttaka (literally Pulverizer, but also translated as Algebra), contains solutions of indeterminate equations of the first and second degree, which later directly influenced the evolution of algebra in the Islamic World. His other important work is Khanda Khadyaka, which gives further developments in trigonometry, including a method of obtaining the sines of intermediate angles from a given table of sines.

    Sridhara (fl.800 CE): 

    Sridhara was from Bengal. His most important work is the Trisatika, which is one of the greatest works on arithmetic before Bhaskaracharya’s Lilavati. In it, he deals with elementary operations, including extracting square and cube roots and fractions. Eight rules are given for operations involving zero. His methods of summation of different arithmetic and geometric series were to become standard references in later works.

    Mahavira (fl.850 CE): 

    He was a Jain and thus was familiar with Jaina Mathematics. His works include Ganita-sara-sangraha, which deals with arithmetic operations and a number of examples to illustrate the rules.

    Bhaskara II (b.1114 CE): 

    Bhaskaracharya( or Bhaskara the teacher) was from the Sahyadri region of modern Maharashtra. His most famous work is Lilavati, which contains a profound understanding of arithmetic, permutations & combinations, and rules to work with zero. His other work, Bijaganita, contains problems on determining unknown quantities and solving simple & quadratic equations.

    Classical India was greatly affected by both the import & export of foreign cultures. Indian mathematics was influenced by Greece & China and, in turn, influenced cultures like Persia, Arabia, and even China & Greece. India was a powerhouse when it came to arithmetic, geometry, and especially algebra and trigonometry. 

    Chapter 3: Legacy & Influences

    During the later medieval period, after the Islamic Conquests in India, much of the mathematical tradition declined. But it managed to survive through regional schools. The most famous of those schools was the Kerala School of Astronomy and Mathematics between the 14th and 16th centuries CE. Their most important members were the Madhava, its founder, Paramesvara, Damodara, Nilakantha, Jyesthadeva, Achyuta Pisaroti, Citrabhanu & Sankara Variyar & their most important contribution was the series expansion for trigonometric functions of sine, cosine & arctangent, including an infinite series for pi by Madhava. Their works were completed two centuries before the invention of calculus in Europe, which is now considered the first example of a power series other than the geometric series.

    The school later inspired S.Ramanujan(1887-1920), who made great contributions to mathematical analysis, number theory, infinite series & continued fractions. There is a book and a movie after him named The Man Who Knew Infinity.

    Other important legacies of Indian Mathematics include the inspiration to Al-Khwarizmi, who studied Brahmagupta’s Brahma Sphuta-Siddhanta and wrote Al-Jabr, from which the word algebra comes, and theFibonacci sequence, which originally is credited to an Indian poet & mathematician, Pingala, in 200 BCE. Other contributions are beyond the scope of this blog.

    Conclusion

    India has a huge contribution in the field of mathematics, which many modern scholars highly neglect. On the other hand, the extraordinary claim of India being the sole ancient hub of knowledge is also false. In truth, India was one of the major contributors in mathematics & science, which shared its knowledge with Greece, China, Persia, Egypt & others in a bidirectional manner. Hope you liked this blog. If you find this interesting, please share and subscribe. Also, comment on any suggestions, queries, or criticisms. I will be happy to answer them. You can also subscribe to my Substack newsletter for any future updates.

  • Game Theory and Its Powerful Impact on Evolutionary Levels

    Game Theory and Its Powerful Impact on Evolutionary Levels

    Introduction

    Human beings are social animals; through the process of evolution, mankind developed short-term tactics and long-term strategies in order to cooperate and exist together in a society and, in turn, a civilization.

    Game Theory is a branch of applied mathematics that uses models of strategic interactions where subjects or players make decisions that are interdependent. It is used to study the decision-making of animals, humans, and even computers. It was first developed by John Von Neumann and Oskar Morgenstern in 1944.

    In this blog, we are going to discuss the basic concepts of Game Theory with some popular examples, and also understand how decision-making and strategy evolved from the genetic or individual level to society to the civilizational level.

    Chapter 1 – The Game Theory Primer: Models of conflict & cooperation

    The Prisoner’s Dilemma-

    Let us suppose two people, A and B, have been caught as suspects for a crime, but the police have no hard evidence. So they took the two prisoners separately and gave them a choice- either to confess or not, with the condition that- 

    i. If both confess, they get deserved punishment, but on early parole, let it be 2 years.

    ii. If one confesses and the other denies, the one confessing is set free, let it be 0 years, and the other gets a harsher punishment, let it be 3 years.

    iii. If both deny, both are given even lighter punishment, as the police have no hard proof to give the actual punishment, let it be 1 year.

    So the condition that arises can be described in tabular form as follows.

    B stays silentB confesses
    A stays silent1,13,0
    A confesses0,32,2

    Now, A does not know what B will choose. Suppose B stays silent, A will suffer less if he confesses, as 0 years are better than 1 year. Now, if B confesses, A will suffer less if he confesses because 2 years are better than 3 years.

    The same is also true from B’s point of view.

    Thus, both of them confess to making the best decision.

    This is the non-iterative form of the prisoner’s dilemma, that is, they don’t have to repeat the same thing again.

    Now, if the Prisoner’s Dilemma is repeated-

    To see this, Robert Axelrod, a political scientist, organized a computer game tournament in 1980. He invited many game theorists to participate in the tournament with their own unique programs, which were called strategies. In the tournament, each strategy was paired with another for a 200-round Prisoner’s Dilemma game. The whole tournament was repeated 5 times to make it precise. A total of 15 strategies participated, and the winner was a strategy called “ tit for tat”. It was designed such that it cooperated at first but defected once after its opponent defected, that is, it held a grudge only for the next round and then forgave. 

    All the top top strategies shared some qualities-

    They were nice and didn’t defect at first.

    They were forgiving and didn’t hold a grudge after 1 round.

    Then Alexrod organized a second tournament, with the only change being that no one knew the actual number of rounds. That time, a total of 63 strategies participated. The winner was again “tit for tat”.

    Apart from the first two qualities, Axelrod found two more qualities in top strategies-

    They retaliated immediately in the next round after being cheated.

    They were clear and simple.

    Although when tit for tat was later run against all nasty and defecting strategies, it came last, which shows there is no single best strategy; everything depends on the situation and surroundings. Although it was also seen that when there was some cooperation from other strategies, tit for tat and other good strategies, although being a minority, became dominant strategies soon. Later, it was found that tit for tat would do better if it retaliated 90% of the time instead of 100%. 

    Zero-Sum vs Non-Zero-Sum Games

    Zero-Sum games are those where one person’s win is another person’s loss. For example, tennis, chess, and most sports.

    Non-Zero-Sum games or strategies where one person’s outcome is independent of the other’s and vice versa. For example, if there are two shops and only one customer, if he goes to one shop, it doesn’t mean a loss to the other shop, as he can go there too at a later time; in fact, he has neither gained nor lost anything.

    I would like to refer to Veritasium’s YouTube video titled “This game theory problem will change the way you see the world” if anyone wants more details.

    Chapter 2- Evolution of Strategies at the Genetic and Individual Level

    The concept of Evolution in its true form was first described by Charles Darwin around 1859. Although before him many have intuitions about the truth, it was Darwin who gave a structured theory to it. It is the evolution of strategies at the genetic level that has helped us survive for millions of years. Each species has developed unique strategies to survive with its own set of morals. Black-headed gulls eat each other’s babies, and female Praying Mantises eat their male partners during mating for nutrition. Bees defend their nests/hives by stinging and, in turn, sacrificing their lives. Each organism has its own strategy, mostly to survive and pass on its genes.

    The more they replicate, the more the species survives. DNA acts as our replicator for survival. The British evolutionary biologist Richard Dawkins, in his book “The Selfish Gene,” suggests that it is more natural to be selfish than to be altruistic in order to survive.

    Now, let us consider a Hawk and a Dove interaction and assign points to the results-

    50 points for a win, 0 for a loss, -100 for being seriously injured, and -10 for wasting time over a long contest. These points can be thought of as being directly convertible into the currency of gene survival.

    In a single Hawk vs Dove interaction, Hawk will always win. If there are only Doves, the winner will get 50 points for winning and -10 for wasting time, so in total, he scores 40. The loser gets -10 for wasting time, so the total average payoff from this interaction is  (40-10)/2 =15. But now, if a mutant Hawk arrives in the population, he beats every dove and scores 50 each time; he enjoys a huge advantage over the doves, who usually get 15 on average. Hawk’s gene will thus rapidly spread through the population. But slowly the Hawks’ chances to win every fight will decrease, and at last, if there are only Hawks left, the winner will get 50, but the loser will get -100 for being seriously injured, resulting in the average result of interaction (50-100)/2= -25. But now a single Dove moves in the population, he will lose, but he manages to never get hurt, his average payoff is 0, while Hawks are usually getting -25, so Dove’s gene will survive and spread through the population. The stable ratio of Hawks and Doves turns out to be (7/12) and (5/12). At this point, the average payoff of both the Hawks and the Doves is equal to about 6(¼).

    This model also applies to human beings. Apart from the Hawk and the Dove strategies, there are other strategies like the Retaliator, which plays like a Dove in the beginning but retaliates when attacked by a Hawk. There is also the Bully who behaves like a Hawk until someone hits back, then he runs away. Another strategy is the Prober-Retaliator, who behaves like a Retaliator but occasionally tries experimental escalation of the contest. He behaves like a Hawk if his opponent does not fight back, and if opponents fight back, he reverts to conventional threatening like a Dove.

    Among the five strategies in a computer simulation, the Retaliator emerges as the most stable, followed by Prober-Retaliator, which is nearly stable. Although this result, the implementation of strategies varies from one situation to another.

    Each individual has a much closer relationship with individuals with whom they share more genetic information or relatedness. An individual is closer to his parents because he shares 50% genes with both his father and mother, and their relatedness is thus (½). The relatedness between two brothers is also (½) as they share 50% of genes. The formula for relatedness can be written as m*(½)^n, where m is the number of common ancestors, and n is the generational distance. For example, the first cousins have two common ancestors and their generational distance is 4, so the relatedness will be 2*(½)^4=(⅛). Thus, a man is closer to his sibling than his first cousin.

    So in this chapter, we see that individuals form groups and associations or act solo based on the strategies of their survival. This chapter also reveals that game theory doesn’t just apply to economics or war- it’s deeply rooted in biology & life.

    Chapter 3- Homo sapiens & the Rise of Civilizations

    Homo sapiens, or the modern human, arrived on Earth about 300,000 years ago in Africa, and about 150,000 years ago, they began to spread to the rest of the world. Before that, there were many other species of humans living in Afro-Eurasia, such as Homo neanderthalensis and Homo erectus. But around 70,000 years ago, something occurred which made Homo sapiens superior to other human species and slowly drove them extinct- The Cognitive Revolution. Due to this, Homo sapiens developed the art of gossiping and telling stories, which enabled them to form larger groups compared to their counterparts. Imagination and gossip created ideas that continued to live even after the creators were dead. This enabled two individuals with no previous encounters to begin working together under a common idea. According to historian Yuval Noah Harari and his book “Sapiens: A Brief History of Humankind”, the Cognitive Revolution is accordingly the point when history declared its independence from biology.

    The Cognitive Revolution also enabled Homo sapiens to travel from one place to another in a group in an efficient way; they were the only species of humans to arrive in the New World. The stories they created soon got embedded in their culture, giving rise to myths and religions around which the earliest settlements were made.

    Then, around 12,000 years ago, came another important point of human history- the Agricultural Revolution. As a result, human beings weren’t required to live their life as hunter-gatherers and thus began to settle down around rivers or areas suitable for agriculture. This resulted in history’s first towns and cities being formed in areas like the Fertile Crescent, the Nile River Valley, the Indus River Valley, the Yellow River Valley, and around the eastern coasts of the Mediterranean Sea. That was also the time when the domestication of animals like sheep, goats, pigs, and chickens took place.

    Early society ran on barter systems of give and take. But it had a problem: to make a trade, each side was required to want what the other had to offer. Thus, money was created as a medium to systematically represent the value of other things for the purpose of exchanging goods & services. The earliest form of money was about 4000 years ago, when shells were used as money. Money soon developed in different regions of the world in different ways, which completely created a new direction for the evolution of mankind.

    Another important point in human evolution was the Scientific Revolution and the Age of Discovery around 1500 CE. Before that, the border between philosophy & science was not very clear, and scientific thoughts were mostly dominated by religions & theologies all over the world. Due to the contribution of geniuses like Nicolaus Copernicus, Galileo Galilei, Johannes Kepler & Sir Isaac Newton, a clear process of scientific thinking was invented, which was clearly distinct from philosophical & theological thoughts. This accelerated the progress of scientific studies, which in turn accelerated human evolution. Also, it was the 1500s when explorers & merchants like Christopher Columbus & Vasco da Gama began their journey of exploration and discovered new continents like America & new trade routes like through the Cape of Good Hope to India. Both the scientific revolution and the age of discoveries enabled a small continent like Europe to colonize most of the world, which further led to the world we see today.

    This chapter thus shows how human beings used storytelling, agriculture, and science to become the ultimate players in the game theory of life.

    Chapter 4- The Effect of Nature & Environment on Human Civilizational Strategies

    The human societies that developed all around the world were directly affected by the following environmental variables: climate, geological type, availability of resources, area of landmass, terrain, and connectivity. We see that the early civilizations evolved faster around tropical or sub-tropical regions. For example, the Mesopotamian, Egyptian & Indus Valley Civilizations progressed at a faster rate compared to cultures in the Steppes. This was because the former regions get more direct sunlight compared to the latter regions. Since the early economy was agrarian, the places with more sunlight have more developed agriculture & economy. Also, rivers like the Euphrates, Tigris, Nile & Indus played an important role in providing water for irrigation, which the areas like the Arabian Peninsula didn’t receive much. The shape of the landmass also heavily affected the spread of culture and, in turn, growth. Historian Jared Diamond in “Guns, Germs & Steel” states that the cultures in Eurasia evolved faster than the cultures in the Mesoamerica and Sub-Saharan Africa because Asia and Europe are longer in the East-West direction thus the climate being same it was easier to communicate, where as America & Sub-Saharan Africa are longer in the North-South direction which hindered communication because of variation in latitudes and in charge climate.

    Also, some countries developed natural protections that protected them from foreign invasion to some extent. For Example, the Himalayas for India, the Tibetan Plateau & the Mongolian Plateau for China & the Sahara Desert for Egypt. This caused those countries to feel secure from early invasions and concentrate on their individual progress. The livestock also played an important role in the cultures, for example, the camel in the case of Egypt & the cow in the case of India.

    The ease of communication also got affected by the availability of nearby routes, which are tried & tested, thus the cities on the Silk Route slowly evolved into influential economic hubs.

    Later, after scientific & industrial evolutions in the 15th-16th & 18th-19th centuries, different criteria became more important. Colder countries began to develop more as there were easier-to-store rations, compared to hotter countries. Moreover, the disadvantages due to terrain & isolation disappeared because of the invention of railways, airways, telephones, mobile phones & internet.

    In the modern world, the civilizational game theory is less dependent on natural causes & more dependent on scientific, economic, military & political causes.

    Conclusion

    Thus, we conclude that game theory acts at different levels- genetic, individual, societal, geographic, civilizational, as well as economic & political. In understanding these games, it will not only help us to understand history but also help us in discovering the hidden causes of genetic, human & civilizational progress.

    Let me know how you consider this blog, please like, comment & share if you find this interesting. Also, do subscribe to my Substack newsletter for notifications regarding future blog posts and updates.

  • Forgotten Timekeeping Concepts Across Important Civilizations

    Forgotten Timekeeping Concepts Across Important Civilizations

    Introduction

    Archaeoastronomy is the study of how the universe, space, and time were viewed in the past. Timekeeping is the art of recording time using a device or calculations. In this blog, I am writing about the way eight ancient cultures, namely India, China, Egypt, Mesopotamia, Mesoamerica, Greco-Roman World, Celtic/Northern Europe & Islamic World viewed space & time, their cosmology, and their methods of time keeping before the invention of the telescope and the modern clock. How different worlds got inspiration from each other and also their evolution.

    India

    Ancient India was very much inclined to cosmology and timekeeping. According to Hindu Cosmology, time is circular with no beginning or end, but has huge cycles known as Kalpa. A Kalpa is a day of Brahma, the God of Creation, which measures about 4.32 billion earthly years. Brahma’s life spans 100 years, which approximates to 311 trillion earthly years. Each Kalpa is divided into 14 Manvantaras, each lasting 306.72 million years, and each Manvantara is divided into 4 Yugas or ages, which are Satya Yuga, Treta Yuga, Dvapara Yuga, and Kali Yuga. According to Hindu Cosmology, the current Yuga is the Kali Yuga. In Buddhist Tantric Systems, time is also considered cyclical, like Hindu cosmology. The cyclical nature is called Kalachakra, or the Wheel of Time.

    The calendars followed in Ancient India were lunisolar, i.e., a combination of lunar cycles and solar years of 365 days. The most common calendars were the Vikram Samvat Calendar from 57 BCE and the Saka Calendar from 78 CE.

    India also had texts on Astronomy & Astrology. The earliest known text on Astronomy & Astrology is the Vedanga Jyotisha from around 1350 BCE. It also includes Geometry and basic Trigonometry. Another later text, which was heavily influenced by the Greeks, is Yavanajataka (Ancient Indians called the Greeks as Yavanas), which was written after the Greeks came into contact with India during  Alexander’s campaign. Another great astronomical text was the Surya Siddhanta, written around 600 CE. In this text, Surya, the Sun God, gives wisdom about astronomy to Maya, the father-in-law of Ravana, the main antagonist of the epic Ramayana. Surya Siddhanta describes gravity a millennium before Sir Isaac Newton and also describes the size and positions of nearby planets quite accurately. It also describes how time passes at different rates under different circumstances and through different perceptions, which can be considered an earlier concept of relativity.

    India also had sites aligned to celestial movements. For example, Junapani stone circles (1500-500 BCE), which were primarily burial sites but also positioned in alignment with the winter solstice sunrise. The Ancient Indians also had their own Prime Meridian passing through Ujjain in modern Madhya Pradesh.

    In early modern India, there were five big observatories built by King Jai Singh II of Amber around the 18th century, called Jantar Mantar. The largest Jantar Mantar is in Jaipur, Rajasthan, which contains the world’s largest sundial.

    China

    Daoism highly influenced Ancient Chinese Cosmology. According to it, the world is composed of Yin and Yang, two opposite but complementary forces. Yin, being passive, dark, and feminine, and Yang, being active, bright, and masculine, represent every duality of nature. Together they represent continuous cycles of creation, balance & transformation. The proper symbolization of Yin and Yang was first introduced by the Chinese philosopher Zou Yan in the 3rd Century BCE.

    The Chinese followed  Lunisolar calendars, combining lunar cycles and solar years of 365 days.  They designed their calendars using Sundials & Water clocks, both of which were very much popular in Ancient China. They also developed astronomical charts that depicted stars & constellations. They used lines called skeleton lines, which were used by the government to convey political & cultural values. These star charts were also popular in their sphere of influence, namely Japan, Korea & Vietnam.

    They used Oracle Bones, which were made from Ox shoulder blades or Turtle Shells. The cracks in them were used during the Shang Dynasty (1600-1046 BCE) for divination and to predict Astronomical events.

    China, in later years, also had a huge number of observatories to study the sky after the influence of post-medieval missionaries. Emperor Kublai Khan also ordered the construction of observatories throughout China.

    Egypt

    The Ancient Egyptians’ cosmology consists of Ra, the Sun God, who was also linked to creation by creating the universe and life, and also destruction by destroying chaos. Ra was said to travel through the sky in his Solar Barques: The Mandjet during the day and Mesektet during the night. This journey of Ra in his vessels represented life, birth, and rebirth, thus creating a cosmic order.

    They used mainly a Solar Calendar of 365 days (12 months * 30 days + 5 extra days) for general purposes and also had a lunar calendar for religious and temple contexts.

    The Egyptians relied on the helical rising of  Sirius or Sothis (after 70 days ) to align their civil calendar with astronomical and agricultural cycles. This coincided with the annual flooding of the Nile during mid-July. This also marked the Egyptian New Year. The star was ultimately linked to rebirth & fertility.

    The Egyptians were known for the use of Obelisks for timekeeping. Obelisks were used as sundials and were designed to follow the sun from east to west throughout the day.

    Mesopotamia

    The Mesopotamians had a Lunisolar Calendar of 354 days; they used metonic systems to adjust the months to 29 or 30 days. The Sumerians also had a Lunar Calendar with 12 months with an average of 29.53 days. They periodically inserted a 13th month to align with the solar year.

    The Mesopotamians had an old history of astronomical observation dating back to 2000 BCE. In star catalogues like the Three Stars Each and also MUL.APIN divided the fixed stars into 3 groups: Anu, Enlil, and Ea, based on where they rose in the Eastern Hemisphere. The stars in the Northern Hemisphere were linked with Anu, the stars in the Equatorial  Region linked with Enlil, and the stars in the Southern Hemisphere with Ea. Anu, Enlil, and Ea were also the three supreme gods of the Mesopotamian Pantheon. Anu was the sky god with the highest importance, Enlil was the god of winds and storms and considered the most powerful of the three, and Ea was the god of water, wisdom, and creation. In a series of 68 to 70 Mesopotamian cuneiform tablets named Enuma Anu Enlil, astronomical and atmospheric events were precisely described, including solar and lunar eclipses, star positions, etc.

    The Mesopotamians also built massive high structures to study astronomy and religious omens, named Ziggurats, which in Akkadian meant “Mountain Peak”.

    Mesoamerica

    The Olmecs were the earliest known Mesoamerican culture that lived between 1500 and 200 BCE. They contributed a lot to astronomy, timekeeping, and even mathematics. One such example is the creation of the ritualistic Tzolkin calendar of 260 days (13 months * 20 days).

    The Maya developed a Long Count Calendar to record days from a mythological starting point of August 11, 3114 BCE. It consisted of 5 units: Bak’tun(144000 days), K’atun (7200 days), Tun (360 days), Winal( 20 days) & K’in(1 day), combining numbers 1 to 19 in a positional system to represent dates which would reset after every Bak’tun cycle. For example, December 21, 2012 CE marked the end of one Bak’tun cycle and the beginning of another without a cataclysm.

    They also built pyramids, which were aligned to cardinal directions and celestial events reflecting sacred cosmology comprising both human and divine realms.

    The Mayas used books called codices to record history, pictograms, and celestial representations. About 3-4 codices survive today

                                  Dresden Codex- deals with astronomy, calendars, and prophecies. The most important codex.

                                  Paris Codex- deals with religious ceremonies, astronomy, constellations & history.

                                  Madrid Codex- tells about Maya gods and rituals associated with them.

                                  The Maya Codex of Mexico, formerly called the Grolier Codex, deals with astrology and predictions.

    The Aztecs used a solar calendar of 365 days named Xiuhpohualli of 18 months of 20 days plus 5 extra days. There also existed a parallel ritual calendar called the Tonalpohualli of 260 days. The two calendars ran simultaneously and together formed a 52-year century known as the calendar round or “xiuhmolpilli’. This marked the renewal of the sun.

    The Aztecs also created a massive basalt structure commonly known as the Aztec Sun Stone around 1427 CE. Also known as the Calendar Stone. It depicted five eras or five suns of the Aztec cosmology. The central figure consisted of a face often identified with the sun god Tonatiuh. Some scholars also argued that the face is of an earth monster named Tlaltecuhtli or a hybrid deity, Yohualtecuhtli, or the Lord of the Night.

    The Greco-Roman World

    The Greco-Roman world had one of the most advanced systems of astronomy and timekeeping. They primarily followed a lunisolar calendar but were later reformed by Julius Caesar in 46 BCE to a solar calendar, also called the Julian Calendar. Later, under  Emperor Constantine in 336 CE, the Christian Calendar was influenced by the Julian Calendar, like the establishment of Christmas on December 25, coinciding with the solstice and Roman Festivals.

    Ancient Greeks devised an analog computer called the Antikythera Mechanism in order to observe and calculate astronomical positions and events, including the sun, moon, planets, lunar eclipse,s etc. It used intricate gears reflecting advanced knowledge of trigonometry and astronomy.

    Greeks were also early proponents of Heliocentrism. Astronomer Aristarchus of Samos challenged Aristotle’s Geocentric model. Though his ideas were rejected and later totally dismissed by Hipparchus of Nicaea. Hipparchus of Nicaea was a Greek astronomer around the 2nd century BCE who is well known for the discovery of the equinoxes and the gradual shift of the orientation of Earth’s axis, affecting the equinox over time. He estimated the precision rate of about one degree per century, implying a full cycle of approximately 36000 years. He also recorded specific dates of autumnal and vernal equinoxes between 162 and 135 BCE in Egyptian calendar terms.

    Another important astronomer was Claudius Ptolemy of the 2nd Century CE. He preferred the geocentric model and also introduced the concepts of epicircles whose centre moves around larger circles around the Earth. His system allowed the prediction of celestial motions and eclipses until it was superseded by the heliocentric model. He was also the first cartographer to use latitudes and longitudes.

    The Romans were known to build sundials of various shapes and sizes- even horizontal and vertical. They also developed portable sundials, which can be seen as the ancient wrist watches.

    Celtic/Northern Europe

    The Druids and the Ancient Northern Europeans were known to build huge observatories like the Clava Cairns in Scotland, the Stonehenge in Wiltshire, Southern England, and Ireland’s Boyne Valley. They were used for both as sundials and as observatories. The Stonehenge, a circular ‘henge’ earthwork of about 360 feet in diameter, was built around 3100 BCE. It was primarily a burial pi,t but also acted as a sundial. The Clava Cairns is a Neolithic site where passage graves align with the winter solstice at sunset, illuminating inner chambers at mid-winter.

    The Celtic festivals are closely tied to the seasonal cycles. Main festivals include Samhain (around 31st October/ 1st November) signaling the Celtic New Year and the end of harvest, Imbolc (1st/2nd February) marking the start of spring, Beltane(30th April/ 1st March) celebrating the beginning of summer, Lughnasa(1st August) marking the start of autumn and harvest, Yule during Winter Solstice, Ostara during Spring Equinox, Litha during Summer Solstice and Mabon during Autumn Equinox, completing the annual cycle of the Wheel of the Year.

    They also have the Celtic Cross, featuring a Christian cross and a circle intersecting its arms, representing the sun’s illuminating shining rays behind the cross, blending Christian and Celtic traditions. The design reflects the Celtic reverence for nature and the sun, symbolizing light, life, and spiritual illumination.

    The Islamic World

    The Islamic world follows a lunar calendar called Hijri of about 354 days with 12 lunar months.

    In medieval times, they were known to use Astrolobe, an ancient astronomical instrument developed around the 6th century CE, used to measure time and the position of celestial bodies by determining their altitude. Though first developed by Europeans, it was refined by the Islamic world.

    During the Islamic Golden Age, most mosques engaged a full-time astronomer called Muqqawil. They were used to find Qibla, or the direction towards the Kaaba in Mecca. They were also used to keep the lunar calendar accurate and for studying eclipses, comets, and stellar positions.

    In the 10th-11th century CE, a sophisticated method was developed by the Khwarazmian polymath Al-Biruni to measure time using shadows, particularly to develop solar hours and muslim prayer times. His work ‘Shadow’ in 1021 CE details techniques involving gnomonic measurements, the calculation of solar hour angles through the sine of the sun’s altitude, and the use of shadows for various astronomical problems. His shadow-based time measurements integrated trigonometry and astronomical observations with precision and greatly influenced Islamic cartography.

    Short Summary For Each Civilization

    • India saw time as eternal & cosmic- woven through Yugas and Kalpas, a sacred rhythm between the stars and the soul.
    • China measured time in cycles and harmony between Yin and Yang, using calendars for dynastic & administrative purposes.
    • Egypt viewed time as a divine order, ruled by Ra’s daily journey,  anchored in temples through the worship of the sun.
    • Mesopotamia calculated time through mathematics & predictions, recorded through Cuneiform tablets.
    • Mesoamerica honored time as sacred & cyclical, counting not just days but destinies, etched into codices & stones.
    • The Greco-Roman World understood time as rational & observable, through analog computers, geocentric spheres & sundials.
    • Celtic/Northern Europe sensed time through seasons, where solstice danced through megalith gates.
    • The Islamic World embraced time with devotion, refining Astrolabes and studying shadows.

    Conclusion

    The concept of time has always kept human beings thinking throughout millennia. Before the invention of telescopes and analog clocks, timekeeping and cosmology were viewed entirely differently from what is being considered now. Those views, though only partially accurate, give an understanding of how different ancient cultures perceive time and its structure.

    If you find the post interesting, please like, comment, and share. Also, you can subscribe to my Substack newsletter for more future content and updates.

  • From Shadows to Smartwatches: The Fascinating Evolution of Clocks Through History

    From Shadows to Smartwatches: The Fascinating Evolution of Clocks Through History

    Introduction

    Human beings have been fascinated with time for tens of thousands of years. Early Homo sapiens used time to know when to hunt, rest, cultivate, etc. For measuring time accurately, Neolithic humans began to construct timekeeping devices, which later came to be known as clocks. These clocks added punctuality to the human mainframe and accelerated efficiency to a great extent. In this blog, we discuss nine such clock models that revolutionized the field of Horology (the field of measuring time and making timekeeping devices). We discuss their construction, working, and their impact on timekeeping. So, let’s explore the evolution of clockmaking technology through the sands of time.

    Chapter 1: Sundial (~3500 BCE – 1600 CE)

    Sundials are the earliest known clocks or timekeeping devices, created by human beings. They consisted mainly of a platform with indicator markings and a rod-shaped figure above it, also known as a gnomon. During the day, the gnomon cast a shadow over the platform, whose length and angle were measured and calculated to find the exact hour. The device depended on human observation and calculation, and only worked when sunlight was available. Sundials were soon replaced by more efficient clocks in the future, especially the mechanical clock. They are still on display in various regions for decorative and educational purposes.

    Chapter 2: Water Clock / Clepsydra (~1500 BCE – 1600 CE)

    Water clocks (or Clepsydras) were one of the earliest known clocks made by man, which were independent of any external cause, like sunlight. They were famous in ancient Egypt, Greece, and China. They were built with various designs, especially the Chinese and Arabs devised many complicated mechanisms. In simple terms, the device consisted of two containers connected through a simple pipe or a hole. Water was poured into one of the containers and allowed to drip into the other at a controlled and measured rate. The empty container had markings that could indicate the time passed based on the volume of water filled. In some models, markings were instead on the container filled with water, and time was calculated on the basis of the decrease in water levels of the container. In both models, the water clocks proved superior to sundials and were used mostly at night. Their use declined after the invention of the mechanical clock during the 15th-16th centuries.

    Chapter 3: Candle / Incense Clock / Hour Glass (~500 – 1800 CE)

    Around the middle of the first millennium CE, a new type of mechanism was created to make timekeeping portable, so it could be carried from one place to another. Thus, the candle clock and the hourglass were invented. The candle clock was nothing but a candle with markings on it that indicated the time elapsed as the candle burned over the course of time. Hourglasses, on the other hand, were an improvisation on the water clocks, where sand and glass bulbs replaced water and containers. The amount of sand passed from one bulb to another indicated the time elapsed. After the entire sand had passed to the second bulb, the clock could be easily reset by just switching the second bulb on top, so that sand could then pass to the first bulb, and the clock worked in the opposite direction. Hourglasses were mainly used in long voyages, while the candle clock was mainly used for domestic and ceremonial purposes. Their use declined around the 17th-18th century due to the invention of more advanced clocks.

    Chapter 4: Mechanical Clock (~1300 – 1800 CE)

    Mechanical Clocks were the earliest form of properly engineered clocks. They were much more accurate compared to their predecessors and slowly led to their decline in usage. A typical mechanical clock consists of 5 parts: a power source, a gear train, an escapement, a regulator, and an indicator. In the earliest mechanical clocks, a falling weight was used as the power source. The falling weight interacting with gravity created a steady pull that drove the gear train. A gear train is a system of interconnected gears arranged so that the rotation of one of the gears leads to the rotation of all the gears. These gears drive something called an escapement, a disc with two tooth-like arms called pallets, mounted on a rotating shaft, that control the movement of the gears. This escapement is guided by another object called the regulator. In the earliest clocks, a horizontal cross-bar with adjusted weights known as a foliot was used as the regulator. As the gear train moved the pallets, the escapement moved the bar back and forth. The weights on the foliot resisted sudden changes due to rotational inertia, thereby regulating the movement of the gear train. The regulated motion of the gear train was finally transferred to an indicator, in the form of hands, which displayed it in the form of passage of time on the clock’s face. These types of clocks created a revolution in horology and were in continuous use till the 1800s.

    Chapter 5: Pendulum Clock (1656 – 1930 CE)

    The mechanical clocks, although far superior to their predecessors, had a major disadvantage. Their regulators worked on rotational inertia, depending on the movement of the gear train; thus, their accuracy reduced with time and needed to be readjusted. In 1656, the Dutch mathematician and engineer Christiaan Huygens invented the pendulum clock. It had almost the same design and principle as that of the mechanical clock, except for the regulator part. Instead of the dependent foilot, a pendulum was used as the regulator. Unlike the foliot, the pendulum works on the principle of simple harmonic motion under gravity. The pendulum thus swings in a uniform motion independent of any external object. Thus, the pendulum clock worked as a far better-regulated and, in turn, more efficient clock than the mechanical clock. Another innovation was that the power source was changed from a falling weight to a spring whose potential energy provided the power. The pendulum clocks were in common use till the late 1930s.

    Chapter 6: Marine Chronometer (1735 – 1970 CE)

    The Pendulum Clock, although very efficient and requiring very little calibration, had a major drawback. It was inefficient in sea voyages, as the motion of the pendulum was interfered with by the constant rocking and rolling of the waves. In 1735, the English engineer John Harrison invented the marine chronometer, suitable for sea voyages. The marine chronometer had a balance wheel and a spring in place of a pendulum as the regulator. The wheel oscillated in a uniform harmonic oscillation, and the spring attached to it provided the elasticity, thereby maintaining a uniform regulation independent of both gear train motion and motions from sea waves. The marine chronometer proved to be very efficient in naval expeditions and warfare, and continued to be used till the 1970s, when they were replaced by atomic clocks.

    Chapter 7: Quartz Clock (1927 – present)

    The Quartz Clocks are the first electrical clocks. Here, the power sources are batteries, in place of springs or weights. But the most important innovation is in the regulators. Quartz is a crystal that possesses a unique property called piezoelectricity, the ability to generate electrical pulses when under mechanical stress. Thus, in quartz clocks, tuning forks made of quartz crystal are installed in vibrated conditions, thus creating electrical pulses which act as the regulator. Electrical clocks are far superior in accuracy and efficiency compared to mechanical clocks, and thus, the former completely replaced the latter within decades. Also, quartz being extremely abundant on earth, made quartz clocks extremely cheap, and thus they are still in use in nearly every household.

    Chapter 8: Atomic Clock (1949 – present)

    Atomic Clocks are the champions of accuracy. In an atomic clock, the quartz crystal vibrates and sends electrical signals at a fixed frequency. These electrical signals are then converted to microwave signals. These microwave signals are sent to certain atoms: either Cesium-133, Rubidium-87, or Hydrogen (maser). The microwave signals excite the atoms. These atoms pass through a detector. Any change in the frequency of the electrical signal will change the level of excitation of the atom. The detector will detect the change and send a feedback signal to the quartz, thereby maintaining the regulating frequency. These clocks are so accurate that time has been defined by them. Before the atomic clocks, time was defined by the Earth’s rotation and revolution, whose measurements were affected by tides, earthquakes, and other causes. But after the invention of the Atomic clocks, one second is defined as 9,192,632,770 oscillations of radiation corresponding to a specific energy in the Cesium-133 atom. So, with the invention of atomic clocks, the calculation of time became finally independent of the Earth’s surface. Atomic clocks are now used in global navigation systems like GPS, telecommunication and internet facilities, stock markets, astronomical observations, and many more.

    Chapter 9: Smart Watch (2000 – present)

    Smart watches are direct descendants of Quartz clocks. The main body is the same except that the electrical signals are passed through a digital logical counter, which counts the oscillations. The software associated with it compares the oscillation with an external timeframe (GPS, phone, satellite, etc.) and sends feedback signals to the quartz crystal. Another thing that changed is that smart watches have a digital display frame with no clock hands as an indicator. Except for the regulator, almost all the mechanisms are the same for a smart watch and a quartz watch with a digital frame. They are today used both as timekeeping devices and for external features like measuring heart rate, weather reports, etc.

    Conclusion

    Clocks have evolved along with human civilizations over time. From calculating time to defining time, they have come a long way. The evolution can be classified into three different stages: pre-mechanical, mechanical, and electrical clocks. A proper electronic age for a clock is yet to come (if we don’t count mobile phones and personal computers as electronic clocks).

    That is all for this blog. Hope you enjoyed it. Finally wrote my first “technology” blog after 36 blogs. So, kindly forgive the technical jargon. I will try to minimize them in the future. Will be bringing more blogs on the history of science and technology like this. Please like, share, and subscribe if you want to get updates for my blogs. And thank you for reading the piece.

  • 5 Game Theory Models in Action: Historical Decisions That Follow Logic

    5 Game Theory Models in Action: Historical Decisions That Follow Logic

    Introduction

    Human Beings are social animals. Since the development of their cognition, humans have developed various kinds of tactics and strategies to survive and evolve at both personal and social levels. Game theory is the science related to strategy, developed in conjunction with mathematical models, to determine the best outcomes with respect to the implemented strategy.

    Although officially, game theory was developed by the Hungarian-American mathematician John von Neumann and the German-American economist Oskar Morgenstern in the 1940s, the various “Games” or strategies had been used by human civilizations throughout history. They had taken important decisions for their survival across different cultures and societies on earth, based on their Nash Equilibria. Now, a Nash Equilibrium is a situation inside a game, in which none of the players can improve their state through strategies, without changing the strategies of other players. Its name comes from its developer, the American mathematician John Nash. In the Nash Equilibrium, all players are basically in their best response state and will remain so until one or more players deviate to other strategies. Many games have been developed and studied among the economic, mathematical, business, and even philosophical circles. Each games create a certain interactive situation, with a certain Nash equilibrium, or equilibria. In this blog, we discuss the five most famous games and strategies, along with one historical example for each, showing how certain geopolitical powers acted and reacted in accordance with their specific Nash Equilibrium. So, let’s begin.

    Chapter 1: Prisoner’s Dilemma

    The Prisoner’s Dilemma is perhaps the most well-known, studied, and discussed game in game theory. It is a paradoxical situation developed, which includes two players, each deciding for their general self-interest without knowing the decision of the other. Let us imagine a situation: The police arrested two different individuals on suspicion of robbery in a building. They are kept in two separate cells such that they cannot interact with each other in any possible way. Now, the police went to the individual suspects and gave the following offer. If both of them confess to doing the robbery, both get 3 years of imprisonment. If neither confesses, they get 1 year of imprisonment. But, if one of them confesses to having robbed together while the other denies, the one who confessed is immediately released by the police, while the one who denied gets 10 years of imprisonment. Let us consider the two suspects, A and B. So, the following situation arises:-


    From the table, let us assess the choices of both A and B. As they cannot contact each other, their individual decisions should be based on assumptions about the other. So, if we consider that B confessed, the best decision A has is also to confess, as 3 years imprisonment is better than 10. Similarly, if B didn’t confess, the best decision for A is still confessing, as he would be released instead of serving 1 year of imprisonment. The situation is the same from B’s side. So, both confess and arrive at the Nash Equilibrium, which is confessing.

    Now, let us consider the Trench War Stalemate on the Western Front during the First World War in 1914. The German and Allied forces clashed in Belgium and France. But after both sides failed to achieve a decisive breakthrough, they dug continuous trenches in the ground to avoid catastrophic losses. After months of a potential stalemate, the options the armies had were to restrain, retreat, or continue bombardment. Although at first glance, restraint sounds like the best option in a stalemate, none of the armies could afford to do so without knowing the motives of the other. If one party had stopped bombarding and attacking, there could have been a possible “10-year prison” situation as mentioned before. Also, they could not run away, as this would lead to an unavoidable defeat. So, even after months and years, the two parties continued their aggression till 1918, in order to maintain the Nash Equilibrium of the Prisoner’s Dilemma game.

    Chapter 2: Game of Chicken

    The Game of Chicken is a very different model from the Prisoner’s Dilemma. In this game, there is not one but two Nash Equilibria. Let us consider a situation in which there are two drivers, A and B, driving their two cars towards each other. They had the pre-made agreement that the one who swerves will be trolled by being labelled as a chicken. Now, if none of them swerves and drives full speed toward each other, they will ultimately crash, resulting in severe injury, if not death. Let us consider the injury or death as 0 (the worst possible outcome), being called a chicken as 1 (the second worst outcome), the opponent as 3 (the highest positive outcome), and both swerve as 2 for each (as they neither won nor lost). So, the situation is as follows:-

    So, even though the safest outcome looks like both swerving, that may lead to humiliation for both. Also, neither of them swerving can lead to serious injury or death. Thus, unlike the Prisoner’s dilemma, the best possible outcome is if both players make the opposite decision from each other, i.e., only one of them swerves. This leads to two Nash Equilibria: either Driver A swerves or Driver B swerves and accepts the humiliation of being called a chicken.

    An example of this game is the Kargil War Resolution in 1999. At that time, both India and Pakistan were recent nuclear powers. In May 1999, Pakistani forces and militants illegally occupied high-altitude positions on the Indian Side of the Line of Control (LoC), which is a militarily sensitive region, in the hope of altering the status quo. Indian forces retaliated, and soon the 4th Indo-Pak war, also known as the Kargil war (Kargil being the region), began. India launched strategic, high-altitude operations while avoiding crossing the LoC. Pakistan, on the other hand, faced growing international pressure. Neither force could retreat at first, as it was a matter of pride and honor. For Indians, Kargil was legally part of their motherland, while for Pakistanis, it was their newly occupied territory. Thus, the war continued for two and a half months, until the Pakistani forces retreated. Already hammered and predicting more upcoming devastation, they had to accept defeat. The Indian forces, on the other hand, became victorious and restored the pre-conflict status quo. Thus, both parties attained the Nash Equilibrium of the Game of Chicken.

    Chapter 3: Stag Hunt

    Another interesting game, or model, is the Stag Hunt. It was devised by the French Philosopher, Jean Jacques Rousseau. As per the game, two hunters, A and B, could hunt together a stag, which is a large meal, or could hunt rabbits individually. But hunting together needs trust, as one could always betray the other. Also, hunting a stag alone is very difficult as it is a large beast. Here, we give credit to their accomplishments. If both successfully hunt the stag, we give 10 to each. If they individually hunt rabbits, each gets 2. If one goes for the stag and the other goes for the rabbit, the one hunting the stag is almost certain to fail and gets 0, while the one who goes for the rabbit gets 4, as he is the only successful hunter. Thus, the following matrix describes the situation:-

    From the matrix, we see that neither the hunter will go to hunt the stag alone, resulting in two possible Nash Equilibria: they either hunt the stag together or hunt rabbits individually. Although hunting a stag will give a better outcome, there exists a possibility of betrayal, whereas hunting rabbits gives a lesser outcome but no chance of betrayal, thus resulting in two different kinds of equilibria. The Stag Hunt model thus has two solutions: one based on more profit and the other based on more security.

    A real-life great geopolitical example for this model occurred more than two millennia ago, at the Battle of Salamis in 480 BCE. When Emperor Xerxes (Kshayarshsa in Old Persian) of the Achaemenid (Haxamanesi in Persian) Empire invaded Greece, many Greek states, of different customs and culture, allied under the Athenian general Themistocles. Thus, we see how the Greeks approached a trust-based Stag Hunt equilibrium, thus finally leading to their victory. If they hadn’t allied, it would have been nearly impossible to hunt a stag named Xerxes. 

    Chapter 4: Battle of the Sexes

    Let us suppose a couple where the man wants to watch an action movie together, while the woman wants to watch a romantic movie together. This situation gives rise to a game theory model called the Battle of the Sexes. In this situation, both want to watch the movie of their choice, but together. So, let us give ratings to their satisfaction levels. If both watch different movies, their satisfaction rating is zero, as they feel lonely, not surrounded by their loved ones. But if both watch the same movie, the person whose preferred movie is chosen is more satisfied, getting a satisfaction rating of 2, while the one who compensates for the movie to be with his or her partner gets a satisfaction rating of 1. This results in the following matrix:-

    In this game, we see that to achieve equilibrium, one of them must compensate and achieve a lower level of satisfaction. Thus, the Battle of the Sexes also has two equilibria where one achieves a lower level of satisfaction than the other.

    A classic example of this model is the imperial court arrangement of the Tokugawa Shogunate in Japan from the 17th to the 19th century. Japan, at that time, had two parallel sources of legitimacy: The Emperor in Kyoto, the sacred, ritualistic, and symbolic authority, and the Shogun in Edo (modern Tokyo), the military, administrative, and real power. In the 1600s, Tokugawa Ieyasu became the Shogun after centuries of chaos. He had 3 choices: if the Shogun dominated, a potential rebellion may arise due to moral illegitimacy; if the Emperor dominated, the chaos resumes,  and the only realistic choice was that both powers cooperate with some sort of compensation. Thus, the imperial court was designed such that the Emperor remained as the ceremonial head, while the Shogun took over the administrative, financial, and military powers. Thus, the Shoguns settled with more satisfaction, while the Emperors settled with a little less but were still satisfied. This system of equilibrium with respect to the Battle of the Sexes continued for more than 250 years till the Meiji restoration in the 1860s. 

    Chapter 5: Zero-Sum Games

    The previous games we explored above were all non-zero-sum games, i.e., when one player wins, the other player doesn’t need to lose. But in zero-sum games, when one player gains something, the other player loses the same amount, so that the total outcomes of the strategy remain zero. For example, in a coin toss, if one side picks heads and the other picks tails, only one side wins, and the other side loses. In zero-sum games, the Nash equilibrium is not about trust, fear, coordination, or compromise, like in the previously mentioned models. The only sensible thing each player can do is to assume that their opponent will try to harm them and thus choose a strategy that limits the damage, even in the worst case. In short, strategies here are individualistic.

    An example of a real-life zero-sum game is the Great Game in Central Asia. In the 19th century,  two expanding powers faced each other in Asia: the British Empire in India and the Russian Empire moving south through Central Asia. The central buffer states between them included Afghanistan, Persia, and the Central Asian Khanates. Both had the ambition of influencing these regions. Their options included a formal alliance, open war, and complete withdrawal, with each resulting in a moral or practical defeat. Thus, both empires chose a fourth option, an option of constant rivalry, with espionage, proxy influence, diplomatic pressure, and local interventions. Thus, both sides chose a zero-sum strategy, and when one got a small win, the other suffered a small loss. They interacted independently based on their individual interests and settled into balance, not through cooperation but through mutual limitation.

    Conclusion

    In this blog, we see how mathematical models dominated human interactions and decision-making, even before they were officially formalized. Game theory, however, is not limited to only human beings, but also affects plants, animals, and even algorithms and AIs. Every decision made by them can be modelled into a game of game theory. So, studying these games, which are numerous in number, can benefit those who want to understand human psychology, business interactions, and geopolitical decisions.

    That’s all for this blog. Hope you find this interesting. Please like, comment, share, and subscribe to my newsletters to be notified of future blogs and updates. Finally, thank you for reading this piece, and wish you all a Happy New Year, 2026.

  • From Habilis to Hobbits: A Simple Guide to Humans Who Weren’t Sapiens

    From Habilis to Hobbits: A Simple Guide to Humans Who Weren’t Sapiens

    Introduction

    When we think of human beings, the picture that comes to mind is that of the species Homo sapiens, or modern humans. For the past 50,000 years, Homo sapiens has been the only human species living on this planet. But that was not always the case. We had many human cousins belonging to other species who perished over time. In this blog, we discuss all our mysterious cousins, uncles, and aunties who inhabited the planet long before we became the dominant and only human species. This blog also tries to highlight the common understanding that humans came from monkeys is actually a misnomer. We categorize the other humans into three chapters, namely the pre-humans (those who were not truly humans but formed the roots of human evolution), the early humans (the humans that existed before sapiens and with whom we share our genetic materials), and finally the other humans (the other human species that once lived alongside Homo sapiens but disappeared with in the sands of time and may have exchanged genetic materials through inter species mating). And don’t worry, the blog won’t be too technical and can be enjoyed by anyone who has a little bit of interest and curiosity in science and evolution. So, let’s begin.

    Chapter 1: Pre-Humans

    1. DryopithecusDryopithecus was a genus of ancient great apes from 12 to 5 million years ago. They were the earliest known common ancestor to humans and other apes. Their fossils have been found all over the wide region of Afro-Eurasia. Several species of Dryopithecus existed, including Dryopithecus fontani and Dryopithecus carinthiacus. They existed in various sizes, including small, medium, and even large gorilla-like sizes. Although they were our ancestors, they lacked most of the features of human beings and living apes. Their canine teeth were larger than those of modern and early humans, but not as strongly developed as those of the modern apes. Their limbs were longer than modern humans’ but not that excessively long, and their skulls lacked ridges like those found in modern apes.
    2. SahelanthropusSahelanthropus was a genus of ancient ape that existed between 7 and 5 million years ago, predominantly in Africa. Most likely, they were the first members of Hominini (a taxonomic tribe that includes both modern humans and chimpanzees), although some research suggests that they belonged to Gorillini (a tribe that includes modern gorillas). According to the common norm, they arrived right before the human-chimp split. Their canines were shorter than Dryopithecus, and their faces were also relatively flatter. There is a debate about whether they were the first bipedals (using two legs for walking) or not, although most researchers suggest that the Ardipithecus were the first bipedals.
    3. Ardipithecus – They lived on Earth between 6 and 4.5 million years ago. They were the first bipedals and the first half-tree, half-ground walkers, as the apes began to slowly climb down from the trees. Their upper pelvis was adapted for bipedal walking, while their lower pelvis was still adapted to climbing trees. They had two species – Ardipithecus ramidus and Ardipithecus kabadda. Traditionally, they are considered to be the first ancestors of humans after the split between humans and chimpanzees, although some studies show that they share features with chimpanzees and bonobos. They, however, didn’t have the knuckle-walking style like chimpanzees and bonobos, thus indicating the ancestors of humans never walked with knuckles on the ground like other modern apes.
    4. Australopithecus – They were pre-humans who lived between 4.5 and 2.5 million years ago. The genus name means “southern ape,” as their fossils were first discovered in South Africa. They had a very half-human, half-ape appearance, thus showing the penultimate stages before diverging to a pure human genus. Their brain were smaller like apes but had smaller canine teeth, were fully bipedal (two-legged when walking). They had many species and subspecies, including Australopithecus afarensis, Australopithecus africanus, and Australopithecus sediba, of which the second one is most closely related to modern humans. The genus slowly evolved into three new genera – Homo, Paranthropus, and Keynanthropus, before the original genus went extinct.

    Chapter 2: Early Humans

    1. Homo habilis – They were the earliest representatives of the Homo genus, who lived between 2.5 and 1 million years ago. Literally meaning, Handyman, the Homo habilis were our first ancestors who were the first species on the planet to make simple stone tools for hunting and butchering. The species had human-like feet, arms, and a smaller body compared to the Australopiths. Although smaller in body, they had a larger brain, which suggests one of the earliest examples of cognitive expansion. They were also able to completely plan and coordinate a team hunt. It is also believed by academia that they were the first species to understand cause and effect clearly.
    2. Homo erectus – Also known as “the upright man,” they existed between 2 million and 120 thousand years ago. Their fossils are found throughout Afro-Eurasia. They initially existed in Africa, but later migrated out of Africa and colonized parts of Europe and Asia. As the name suggests, Homo erectus were the first humans to stand upright with a straight backbone. They were also the first humans to discover fire roughly around 1 million years ago. They also improved the stone tools used by the H. habilis. Their tools could be used for digging, vegetable processing, and could be tied with wooden shafts to form javelins and spears.
    3. Homo heidelbergensis – They existed between 700 thousand and 300 thousand years ago. Their brains were larger than both H. habilis and H. erectus. They evolved from Homo ergaster or African Homo erectus. They began developing social intelligence and later developed some forms of archaic languages for communication, which later became one of the greatest human inventions. Their facial features also resembled those of modern humans, like a sharp nose and narrower chins. They also developed stone axes and long-range spears, which made hunting quite easier. It was the Homo heidelbergensis that first developed the division of roles based on physical and social capabilities. Later, the African group evolved into Homo sapiens, the European group into Neanderthals, and the Asian group into Denisovans.

    Chapter 3: Other Humans

    1. Neanderthals – The Neanderthals were archaic humans who lived in Europe, West and Central Asia from 400 thousand to 40 thousand years ago, until completely replaced by Homo sapiens. They had a long and low skull, much larger than that of modern humans. Physically, they were shorter but very muscular with strong shoulders, barrel chest, thick bones, and a powerful grip. They were also users of sharp multipurpose tools for hunting, with which they hunted large animals like mammoths, woolly rhinos, and bison. Those humans used to live in caves and wear tailored clothing. They were also very social animals, as numerous cave paintings, shell beads, and feathers for decoration were found in their burial sites. Research shows that non-African humans today carry 1-2 % Neanderthal genes.
    2. Denisovans – The Denisovans were archaic humans who lived in East and Southeast Asia, as well as in Melanesia and Australia, between 400 thousand and 50 thousand years ago. Nothing much is known about their physical features, as we don’t have many fossils to clearly study them. Although the fossils are few, the sites give us much information about them. They were expert in making stone and bone ornaments and artifacts, which had been discovered in those sites. They were also good hunters, as sharp and polished stone and bone weapons were discovered. The Denisovan DNA gave the Tibetans the EPAS1 gene, allowing low oxygen survival, high-altitude endurance, and better blood oxygen regulation to survive on the Tibetan plateau and the Himalayan ranges. Today, Melanesians and Aboriginal Australians have around 5% Denisovan genes, while East Asians have around 1% Denisovan genes. They, like Neanderthals, were later replaced by Homo sapiens through elimination and absorption.
    3. Homo floresiensis – They were the archaic humans who lived on the island of Flores in Indonesia between 100 thousand and 50 thousand years ago. Also known as Hobbits, they were short, having a height of around just 1 meter (~ 3 feet 3 inches) and weighing around 25 kg. They used stone tools and blades for hunting and butchering. The reason behind their small height, given by academia, is the lack of big predators as well as prey animals. Thus, due to limited resources, they exhibited insular dwarfism, which is even found in many modern species like the Pygmy elephants, the Dwarf hippos, and the Miniature Deer.
    4. Homo luzonensis – They were the archaic humans living between 100 thousand and 50 thousand years ago, and whose fossils were found in Luzon, Philippines. Not much is known except that they had curved toe bones, showing they were frequent tree-climbing humans, as well as having a smaller height of around 1.3 meters (~4 feet). Much more is yet to be discovered, as the first fossil was only found in 2019, making it one of the newest human species to be identified.
    5. Homo naledi – They existed between 300 thousand and 100 thousand years ago, and their fossils were discovered in the Rising Star Cave, South Africa, in 2013. They had small, rounded faces and dentition (teeth) almost similar to modern humans. They showed a few ape-like features, like shoulders angled upwards and ribcages tapered towards the top. No tools had been discovered yet, thus suggesting evolution could be non-linear.

    Comparison Chart

    Conclusion

    Thus, from the blog, we see that human evolution is not as linear as we think. There was a time when five or more human species together coexisted on Earth. This blog also tries to explain the important events in human evolution, like becoming bipedal, using tools, discovering fire, and wearing tailored dress. I hope the blog is neither too technical nor too simple and bland.

    That’s all for this blog. Do write to me what you think about human evolution. Also, like and share if you find the piece interesting. And also, please subscribe to my newsletters if you want to get notified for future updates and blogs. Finally, thank you a lot for reading this piece.

    Suggested Readings

    Disclosure: This post contains affiliate links. As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases. I only recommend books I truly value.






  • The Evolution of Basic Mathematics: From Counting to Calculus

    The Evolution of Basic Mathematics: From Counting to Calculus

    Introduction

    Mathematics is the branch of science dealing with numbers, quantities, shapes, and measurements. It’s an abstract science that primarily consists of abstract concepts, which can also be applied in our day-to-day life for understanding and developing other branches of science. It is also the oldest branch of science practiced by human beings for 20,000 to 30,000 years. As human societies developed, mathematics evolved alongside them, branching into hundreds of specialized fields over the centuries. In this blog, we talk about the history and evolution of the nine main branches of mathematics across the millennia. We discuss how they evolved as separate branches in ancient civilizations and gradually developed in classical, medieval, and modern times. These nine branches are those that are taught in nearly every school around the globe. Branches like topology, game theory, discrete mathematics, and computational mathematics are intentionally omitted as they are usually taught at higher institutes like colleges and universities. So, in order to keep this blog accessible and understandable to everyone, only nine of them have been selected.

    1. Arithmetic

    The oldest proof of arithmetic was found in Central Africa, the Ishango Bone,  dating to around 20,000 BCE. In that bone, deliberate notches were marked that may represent doubling sequence, lunar counts, or early tallying. Later,  tally marks emerged independently across different prehistoric societies. They were generally used to record items and for other trading purposes.

    Around 3000 BCE, the Sumerians developed a base-60 system that became the backbone of Mesopotamian mathematics, which they used for trade, astronomy, and land measurements. This system, millennia later, gave rise to 60-second minute, 60-minute hour, and 360-degree circle. Around the same time, the Egyptians developed a decimal system with separate symbols for 1, 10, 100, and so on. While lacking place value, this system supported large-scale administration, taxation, construction, and record-keeping among the bureaucrats.

    At the beginning of the Iron Age, China developed counting rods arranged on a board to represent numbers using place value, centuries before their appearance in the West. Rod numerals allowed both decimal representation and efficient computation with addition, subtraction, and even multiplication techniques. In Vedic India, on the other hand, the Sulba Sutras used numerical methods embedded with geometry for structuring fire altars. Although not a fully developed number system, they developed ratios, square approximations, and applied arithmetic for ritualistic purposes. The Greeks also developed an alternative acrophonic numerical system where 5, 10, 100, and others were based on initial letters of number words.

    In the first half of the first millennium CE, the Indians introduced a number system with positional notations and zero as a number, and the Chinese developed counting boards under the Han Dynasty. The counting boards used rods arranged in vertical columns for place value, and were used for multiplication, division, square roots, and even systems of equations.

    After the invasion of the subcontinent by the Arabs, they adopted Indian numerals and promoted them across Eurasia, thus known to the world today as Hindu-Arabic numerals.

    Later, in 1202, Leonardo of Pisa, better known as Fibonacci, introduced Hindu-Arabic numerals to Europe through his book Liber Abaci. Thus, these numerals slowly replaced Greco-Roman numerals and became the dominant numeral system in the modern world.

    2. Geometry

    The earliest example of geometry can be found in Ancient Egypt from 3000 BCE. They used knotted cords to survey fields, maintain boundaries, and construct canals around the Nile River. They developed simple mensuration formulas that laid the foundations of geometry later.

    Babylonian clay tablets, especially Plimpton 322 (~1800 BCE), recorded sophisticated lists of right-angle triples like 4-3-5 and 12-5-13. Their works show that the Mesopotamian scribes understood the Pythagorean principles, at least a millennium before Pythagoras was born.

    During the start of the Iron Age, the Sulba Sutras of Vedic India developed geometric diagrams for constructing fire altars. They also contain an approximated value of √2, transformations between shapes of equal area, and methods of creating right angles.

    In Greece, Thales introduced abstract reasoning in Geometry through propositions such as the equality of angles in a semicircle and basic similarity principles. The Pythagoreans, on the other hand, developed theorems related to polygons, ratios, and right triangles. Euclid, in his work Elements, systematized geometry through axioms, definitions, and proofs. Archimedes developed formulae to compute surface areas and volumes of solid figures like spheres and cylinders. He also approximated the value of π

    In the classical age, China’s Nine Chapters on the Mathematical Art created the areas and volumes of various geometric figures independently, thereby influencing future East Asian mathematics. In India, Aryabhata also independently introduced the areas and volumes of different shapes and approximated the value ofπ. He also introduced sine tables, which later became crucial for developing trigonometry.

    In the medieval period, Ibn al-Haytham, of modern-day Iraq, integrated geometric applications to physics, especially optics, in his work, also named Optics.

    3. Algebra

    The Babylonian tablet mentioned in the Geometry section is also very important to Algebra, as the tablet contains quadratic equations solved with geometric reasoning and completing the square methods, thereby acting as one of the earliest examples of algebra known to mankind.

    The Rhind papyrus from Egypt, from around 1500 BCE,  shows linear equations for practical problem solving regarding sharing, proportions, and rates. The Egyptian algebra later influenced the algebra around the entire eastern Mediterranean coast.

    In the 3rd century CE, Diophantus of Alexandra composed Arithmetica, introducing symbolic shorthands for unknowns and methods to solve determinate and indeterminate solutions. In India, Brahmagupta, in his work Brahmasphutasiddhanta, established rules for zero, negative numbers, and algebraic operations, forming a major milestone in global mathematics.

    In the Middle Ages, al-Khwarizmi, in his work Al-Jabr, organized algebra as a discipline focused on solving linear and quadratic equations through reduction and balancing. His work gave us the word “algebra” itself. Another Islamic mathematician, Omar Khayyam, classified cubic equations into geometric types and solved them using intersections of conic sections. Although not symbolic, his work represented the most advanced treatment of cubics before the Renaissance.

    Fibonacci, in his Liber Abaci, introduced methods of solving algebraic problems in Europe. His works included linear and quadratic equations, commercial arithmetic, and recreational problems like the famous rabbit sequence. By combining Mediterranean techniques with Islamic and Indian knowledge, particularly al-Khwarizmi’s and Brahmagupta’s, Fibonacci catalyzed Europe’s transition toward symbolic algebra.

    Later during the Renaissance, Tartaglia discovered methods for solving certain cubic equations, later published by Cardano in Ars Magna, along with Ferrari’s solution to quartics. Much later, Francois Viete introduced systematic symbolic notation using letters for known and unknown quantities, transforming algebra from a rhetorical prose to an abstract language.

    Finally, René Descartes unified algebra and geometry through coordinate methods in La Géométrie, introducing modern exponent notation and the convention of x and y for variables.

    4. Trigonometry

    The earliest example of proto-trigonometric tables can be seen in the Babylonian astronomical cycles working with base-60. Their cuneiform records include lists of reciprocal pairs and angle relations useful for predicting planetary positions.

    In Hellenistic Greece, Hipparchus developed the first known trigonometric table by measuring chords in circles, enabling astronomers to convert geometric angles with numerical values. His Table of Chords effectively established trigonometry as a mathematical discipline in the Hellenistic world.

    In India, Aryabhata introduced a sine table based on half-chords, shifting trigonometry away from Greek chord geometry toward the modern sine function. His systematic values of sine differences helped Indian astronomers compute planetary motions with remarkable accuracy. Bhaskara I and II further expanded Indian trigonometry with interpolation formulas, sine approximations, and early versions of trigonometric identities.

    Islamic scholars like Al-Battani and Al-Tusi formalized trigonometry by introducing functions like tangent and cotangent, developing spherical trigonometry, and creating rigorous tables for astronomical use.

    During the Renaissance, Regiomontanus wrote De Triangulis, the first major European text devoted entirely to trigonometry, establishing it as an important tool for navigation and astronomy.

    Later, John Napier, the Scottish mathematician, in the 16th century, invented logarithms, thereby revolutionizing trigonometric computation. Logarithmic sine and tangent tables dramatically reduced calculation time and errors, enabling efficient handling of spherical spheres.

    5. Probability

    The earliest examples of probability come from the Far East in China. Texts like the I Ching explored probability-like patterns through hexagram combinations. In India, epics like the Mahabharata mention weighted dice and gaming odds, and scholars analyzed outcome frequencies, which can be seen as an early form of probability. In the Arabic World, scholars examined risk in trade, inheritance disputes, and legal judgments. Their writings used combinatorial reasoning for dividing wealth or calculating fair shares in uncertain situations. Though not yet a formal theory, these analyses introduced structured thinking about likelihood, expected value, and equitable outcomes in real-world contexts.

    In the 16th century, Gerolamo Cardano, an Italian mathematician, became the first one to systematically attempt to quantify dice and card games in his work Liber de Ludo Aleae. He used sample spaces and frequency-based arguments to estimate chances, laying the groundwork for mathematical probability. 

    Later Pascal-Fermat letters created the foundation of modern probability theory. Their analysis of the problem of points introduced expected value, combinatorial reasoning, and consistent methods for evaluating uncertain outcomes.

    In the 17th century, the Swiss mathematician Jacob Bernoulli established the Law of Large Numbers, proving that long-run frequencies converge to true probabilities. His work gave probability a firm theoretical basis applicable to statistics, insurance, and scientific inference. Later, Thomas Bayes, the 18th-century English mathematician, introduced the idea of updating probabilities using new evidence, providing the conceptual foundation for Bayesian inference. His theorem formalized reasoning under uncertainty and linked probability to belief revision.

    6. Statistics

    The earliest examples of statistical data collection can be found in the censuses conducted in Ancient Egypt, Mesopotamia, and China about 3,000 years ago.

    Imperial China later maintained the traditional registers for detailed accounts of its demographics, occupations, and agricultural output. Governments used large-scale datasets for taxation, labor allocation, and social policy.

    In India, the Arthashastra described sophisticated data-gathering methods, including crop surveys, population counts, market price tracking, and crime tables. These records supported economic planning and state management.

    Millennia later, the seventeenth-century English thinkers like John Graunt and William Petty pioneered “political arithmetic,” using data on births, deaths, and trade to analyze state power. Later, the German mathematician and astronomer Carl  Friedrich Gauss introduced the normal distribution while studying astronomical measurement errors. His bell curve model revealed how random variations cluster around a mean, becoming a cornerstone of inferential statistics. In the latter half of the 19th century, Karl Pearson, the British statistician, formalized modern statistics by creating correlation coefficients, chi-square tests, and regression methods. His work transformed statistics into a mathematical discipline rooted in probability theory. Later, another British mathematician, Ronald Fisher, advanced statistical theory through concepts like maximum likelihood estimation, analysis of variance (ANOVA), and experimental design principles. Fisher’s framework became the basis of modern statistical science and still shapes research methodology across disciplines.

    7. Logic

    Many of the early civilizations developed their own schools of logic. In India, the Nyaya school developed a rigorous system of reasoning centered on perception, inference, comparison, and testimony. It represented one of the earliest and most detailed logical traditions in the ancient world. In Greece, the Aristotelians organized reasoning into structures based on universal and particular propositions. Aristotle’s Organon shaped Western logic for nearly two millennia, defining rules for deduction, classification, and scientific argument. The Stoics later developed propositional logic, focusing on whole statements rather than terms. They introduced logical connectives, inference rules, and truth value analysis far ahead of their time. Later in India, Buddhist thinkers like Dignaga and Dharmakirti created a sophisticated epistemological framework emphasizing perception and inference. They introduced theories of exclusion, fallacies, and valid cognition, shaping logic across India and Tibet. In the Islamic World, Avicenna extended Aristotelian logic by refining modal reasoning, distinguishing between necessity and contingency, and developing new types of syllogisms. His reworked logical framework deeply influenced Islamic and later European scholasticism. Medieval European scholars later integrated Aristotelian and Islamic logic into a unified teaching tradition.

    Much later, in the 19th century, George Boole, a British mathematician, revolutionized logic by expressing reasoning through algebraic symbols, turning logical statements into mathematical equations. Boolean algebra introduced operations like AND, OR, and NOT, enabling precise analysis of logical relations.

    Gottlob Frege, of Germany, developed predicate logic and argued that mathematics derives from pure logic. His formal system introduced quantifiers and variables, vastly expanding the expressive power of logic. Finally, Bertrand Russell and Alfred North Whitehead attempted to ground mathematics in logic through their Principia Mathematica. Their monumental work formalized set theory, arithmetic, and logic in one system, responding to the foundational crisis. Although incomplete, it shaped twentieth-century logic and influenced computer science and mathematical philosophy.

    8. Set Theory

    Before the formalization of Set Theory, the early mathematicians of Greece, India, and the Islamic world used set-like concepts when grouping numbers, classifying geometric objects, or distinguishing categories of quantities.

    In the 19th century, George Cantor transformed mathematics by showing that different sizes of infinity exist. He introduced one-to-one correspondence to compare infinite sets and demonstrated that real numbers form a larger infinity than natural numbers. This breakthrough challenged long-held assumptions and opened an entirely new domain in mathematical thought. He also defined sets, cardinality, ordered pairs, and transfinite numbers. He built a coherent theory explaining both finite and infinite collections, establishing the basis of modern set theory.

    Later, Ernst Zermelo, the German logician, improved set theory by introducing a formal axiomatic system in 1908, which was later strengthened by Abraham Fraenkel and others, creating the Zermelo-Fraenkel axioms with the axiom of choice(ZFC). This became the standard foundation of mathematics, defining how sets behave, how infinite collections operate, and how structure emerges from simple axioms. ZFC remains the dominant formal model today.

    9. Calculus

    The most ancient form of proto-calculus can be found in Ancient Egypt, where the scribes used practical methods to approximate areas and volumes for fields, granaries, and pyramids. Texts like the Rhind Papyrus show rules for computing slopes and circle areas with near-calculus intuition. The Babylonian tablets also show sophisticated numerical tablets for squares, reciprocals, and compound growth, enabling calculations related to interest, motion, and geometry. Their systematic use of sequences and iterative procedures hints at proto-calculus thinking.

    Later, Greek mathematicians like Eudoxus and Euclid used the method of exhaustion to compute areas and volumes by inscribing ever-finer polygons. It laid the foundational groundwork for integration centuries before calculus was formalized. Archimedes advanced the exhaustion method by summing infinitely many slices to find areas, volumes, and centers of mass. His work on spirals, parabolas, and spheres essentially performed an experimental form of integral calculus.

    In India, around the late 14th century CE, Madhava, the Kerala mathematician, discovered infinite series expansions of trigonometric functions, including a power series form of π. His results anticipated the Taylor series by several centuries, using iterative corrections and convergence analysis. The Kerala School of Mathematics created a remarkably advanced pre-calculus framework rooted in precise infinite summations.

    In the Islamic world, scholars like Ibn al-Haytham and Sharaf al-Din al-Tusi examined the instantaneous rate of change, volumes generated by rotation, and early limit-like arguments.

    Finally, in the 17th century, Isaac Newton and Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz formalized calculus in a structured form. Newton focused on fluxions and instantaneous motion, while Leibniz introduced differentials and integral notation. Together, they unified ideas of change and accumulation, providing rules of derivatives, integrals, and infinite series that became the foundation of modern analysis.

    Later, Leonhard Euler transformed calculus into a powerful symbolic discipline by systematizing functions, derivatives, and infinite series. He introduced standardized notation and solved a vast range of differential equations. Euler’s clarity and depth turned calculus from a discovery into a mature mathematical language used across science and engineering.

    Conclusion

    Mathematics has slowly evolved over the last three millennia. Whether it is arithmetic or trigonometry, statistics or calculus, mathematics now plays an important part in each of our lives – from professional to personal. Thus, knowing the origin of each branch can be very crucial in understanding how the ideas inside the human mind have evolved. Sorry for making such a large blog. For convenience, no formulae or equations have been used. Hope you will not mind the length. So, if you find this blog interesting, please like, share, and subscribe. Also, feel free to comment- whether any criticism, any inquiry, or anything you like. Finally, thank you for reading this blog.

    Suggested Readings

    Disclosure: This post contains affiliate links. As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases. I only recommend books I truly value.

    Share this:



  • Are We Real?: 7 Mind-Bending Models of the Universe

    Are We Real?: 7 Mind-Bending Models of the Universe

    Introduction

    We often wonder about the universe in which we live, about its creation and the cause of its existence. Human beings have long explored periods of existentialism throughout history, which has led thinkers, philosophers, and scientists to develop various theories describing the true nature of the universe, its existence, and its characteristics. In this blog, we discuss the most common theories and models of the universe, which are somewhat mind-bending in their truest sense.

    1. Materialism / Physicalism

    This model proposes that reality consists solely of matter and energy. Everything we experience, which includes thoughts, emotions, and even life, emerges from some form of physical interaction. If something cannot be calculated or measured, then that is considered unreal or non-existent. This model forms the backbone of modern science, from astrophysics to cognitive psychology. It emphasizes that the universe can be studied and analyzed by understanding which are measurable and testable. In pop culture, materialism appears in the novel “The Martian” by Andy Weir, where the protagonist uses physical laws, chemistry, and engineering to survive when stranded alone. Similarly, in the movie “Interstellar” by Christopher Nolan, it is beautifully shown how physical phenomena like black holes, gravity, and relativity govern the lives of human beings.

    2. Idealism

    Idealism counters the materialistic view, i.e., the consciousness is primary, and the physical world is a projection of the mind. Philosophers like Berkeley stated that “to be is to be perceived,” thus indicating that reality depends on awareness. The universe is less like a machine and more like a mental construct created by our brain. Science describes particles, but Idealism asks science whether the particles exist without perception or are a part of the consciousness itself. Movies like “Inception” explore this idea widely, where dream constructs reality. Similarly, the novel “Sophie’s World” by Jostein Gaarder blends philosophy and storytelling to show how ideas shape existence.

    3. Quantum Reality / Observer-Dependent Universe

    Quantum Physics suggests reality may not exist until it is observed. Particles exist in probability clouds, collapsing into a definite state when measured. This challenges classical notions of an objective universe, implying that observation and perhaps consciousness itself play a fundamental role in creating reality. Physicists and Philosophers alike debate whether the observer effect hints at a universe that is participatory rather than deterministic. Movies like “The Matrix” by the Wachowskis touch on this indirectly, with reality shifting based on perception. In short, this theory asks whether reality is waiting for us to notice it to become real.

    4. Simulation Hypothesis

    The Simulation Hypothesis proposes that our universe might be a sophisticated computer simulation created by a higher intelligence. According to the philosopher Nick Bostrom, if advanced civilization can simulate conscious life, it may be statistically likely that we are living in one. In this view, every matter, law, and event is part of a vast computational program, and reality itself could be altered dynamically like a video game. Movies like “The Matrix” show humans trapped in a digital reality without knowing it. The video game series of “The Sims” explores worlds where entities exist purely within programmed systems, designed by us.

    5. Multiverse Theory

    This theory suggests that an infinite number of universes exist simultaneously, each with different versions of reality. Each choice we make creates a branching universe where a different outcome occurs. This framework expands the definition of reality beyond the observable, challenging the notion of a singular “true” universe. Many physicists and philosophers debate whether the alternate realities are real or merely theoretical. Pop Cultural references include the movie “Everything Everywhere All At Once,” where multiple universes collide, and the animated series “Rick and Morty,” where interdimensional travel reveals endless possibilities. Multiverse theory stretches imagination: If infinite realities exist, which one is “ours”?

    6. Panpsychism / Conscious Universe

    Panpsychism states that consciousness is fundamental and present in all things. Rather than arising solely from brains, awareness permeates the universe. This theory offers a solution to the problem of consciousness and implies that even seemingly inanimate matter possesses some form of experience. Philosophers like Philip Goff argue that panpsychism unites science and metaphysics, giving the cosmos an intrinsic awareness. Movies like “Avatar” where Pandora’s life forms are interconnected and aware at a primary level. Panpsychism encourages seeing reality as a network of aware, interconnected existents.

    7. Mathematical Universe Hypothesis

    Max Tegmark’s mathematical universe hypothesis suggests that the universe itself is a mathematical structure, not just describable by math. Physical existence, space, time. And matter emerges from pure mathematical relationships. This idea blurs the line between abstract and reality, implying that understanding the universe is equivalent to understanding its underlying equations. Pop Culture examples include “The Thirteenth Floor,” where reality is literally coded. The theory prompts reflection: if reality is math, then every law, particle, and phenomenon is a mathematical formula we inhabit.

    Conclusion and Reflection

    Thus, physicists and philosophers had suggested various theories and speculations regarding the nature of the universe. There are many more theories other than these seven, but they were not included in it, as this would make the blog extremely large and complicated. If you have any other theories or suggestions, do write in the comments. Also, please like and share if you enjoyed this. Thank you.

    Suggested Readings


    Disclosure: This post contains affiliate links. As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases. I only recommend books I truly value.




  • The Logic Breakers: 10 Paradoxes That Defy Common Sense and Science

    The Logic Breakers: 10 Paradoxes That Defy Common Sense and Science

    Introduction

    Have you ever stumbled upon a puzzle that makes your brain do somersaults? A problem so strange that it feels like the universe is messing with you? Welcome to the world of paradoxes, where logic twists, science shivers, and common sense takes a back seat. From time-travel conundrums to quantum quirks, these ten paradoxes challenge everything we think we know about reality. Strap in, because your mind is about to be stretched in ways you didn’t think possible.

    The Ship of Theseus

    The Ship of Theseus is an Ancient Paradox regarding the change of identity across time. Plutarch first mentioned it in the 1st century BCE. In Greek Mythology, the legendary hero Theseus rescued the Athenians from King Minos by slaying the monster Minotaur and escaping on a ship to Delos. The Athenians celebrated it by taking the ship to Delos. Over time, the damaged and rotten parts of the ships were replaced by new parts. Later, Athenians raised a question that, if every part of the ship were replaced, it would still be the original ship. Also, if it was not the original ship anymore, when did it cease to exist? In Contemporary Philosophy and Cognitive Science, the thought experiment is used to study identity across time and has been applied by various philosophers to study various cases.

    The Grandfather Paradox

    It is a type of temporal paradox that arises along with the concept of time-travel in theoretical physics and philosophy. The paradox arises hypothetically if a man travels through time to his past and kills his grandfather because he gave birth to the time traveler’s parent. As a result, the time traveler won’t be born, which will further result in his grandfather not being killed, which will further lead to his birth, creating a cyclical loop without any definitive result. The Grandfather paradox has been studied by theoretical physicists over time and is also used by many Science Fiction authors and directors in their novels and films.

    The Bootstrap Paradox

    It is another temporal paradox associated with time travel and an unending loop. Suppose a time traveler travels through time hundreds of years into the past and gives a copy of “The Time Machine” to a young H. G. Wells, who later publishes it under his name. Centuries later, the same book inspires the scientists to build an actual time machine, which results in time travel, thereby creating a loop with no starting point. The paradox happens when a person from the past uses a technology or idea of the future, which in turn becomes the cause of its existence in the future. This is another interesting trope used in various fictions by authors and directors in the last century.

    The Sorites Paradox

    Also known as the Paradox of the Heap (Sorites is the Greek word for Heap), it is an ancient problem that states that if removing one grain of sand doesn’t stop it from being a heap, when exactly does it stop being one? It is a paradox related to the identity of an object and questions about the time when it will lose its identity. Some resolutions had been proposed, including denying the existence of the heap and setting a fixed boundary to be called a heap.

    The Twin Paradox

    This paradox arises from the treatment of time in Special Relativity. It arrived due to the concept of Time Dilation, according to which, if a person or a thing travels at a speed significantly closer to the speed of light, their relative time from a different frame of reference slows down. So if one of two identical twin sisters travels to space at a speed near the speed of light and returns to earth after one year, she will find that she has aged significantly less than her twin who stayed on earth. But in relativity, what one observer sees for the second observer, the second observer sees the same for the first one, as time is relative. So, the space-going sister must see the time on Earth moving more slowly, resulting in a contradiction or paradox. The solution to this paradox can be found in general relativity through acceleration. The situation is not symmetrical because the traveling twin changes frame of reference – first while accelerating to space and second while decelerating to Earth. During the turnaround, the traveling twin experiences a shift in simultaneity, which counts as the “present time” on Earth suddenly jumps forward from her point of view. Thus, when they reunite, the sister who stayed on Earth is older. So, this paradox is theoretically solved and thus technically no longer a true “paradox”.

    The Observer Effect

    This paradox arises in quantum mechanics, where observing something sometimes changes its state, suggesting that reality itself depends on perception. In the quantum world, particles like electrons don’t have definite positions or velocities until they are measured, i.e., they act as probability clouds or waves of probabilities. When we observe or measure one, the wave collapses into a single state, meaning our act of observation determines which version of reality becomes real. For example, in the Double-Slit Experiment, when electrons aren’t observed, they behave like waves and interfere, creating a pattern. But when we set up detectors to watch which slit they go through, they act like particles instead, and the interference disappears. Thus, the observer effect shows us that in the quantum world, knowledge and reality are deeply entangled; we cannot study something without becoming part of its story.

    The Fermi Paradox

    It is the contradiction between the high likelihood of the emergence of extraterrestrial lifeforms and the lack of evidence for it. It is named after the physicist Enrico Fermi, who informally asked the question, “Where is everybody?” during a conversation at Los Alamos in 1950 with colleagues Emil Konopinsky, Edward Teller, and Herbert York. It was later popularized by the superstar physicist Carl Sagan in the 1960s. There have been various attempts to resolve the Fermi Paradox by searching for any sign of intelligence in outer space, with no positive results to date.

    The Paradox of Tolerance

    It is a philosophical problem in decision-making, which suggests that a society that tolerates everything, including tolerance, eventually destroys its own tolerance. It was proposed by philosopher Karl Popper in “ The Open Society and Its Enemies” in 1945. In this work, he proposed that a tolerant society should be intolerant of people who promote intolerance. This is a social paradox that raises the question of true tolerance. It has been questioned and debated by many philosophers, sociologists, and anthropologists since its coinage without achieving a true solution.

    The Barber Paradox

    It is a classic logical paradox that says if a barber is a person who shaves all men who don’t shave themselves, then who shaves the barber? Any answer to it is a contradiction, as a barber cannot shave himself, as he shaves those who don’t shave themselves. Thus, if he shaves himself, he ceases to be a barber. Also, if a barber ceases to shave himself, he will fall in the category of people who don’t shave themselves, and he ceases to be a barber.

    The Omnipotence Paradox

    This paradox goes like this: “Can an all-powerful being create a rock so heavy that even it cannot lift it?” If the being can’t create it, then it’s not all-powerful, and if it can, but then can’t lift it, it’s also not all-powerful. Either way, absolute powers seem self-contradictory. The paradox exposes a limit to language and logic, not necessarily in divinity. It shows that some statements, like a “square circle,” are logically meaningless, not things that can exist even in principle. So the more precise form of the argument is: Omnipotence does not mean the ability to do the logically impossible. Some philosophers reinterpret omnipotence as coherence-based, meaning a being is omnipotent within the boundary of consistent logic. Others (especially in theology and metaphysics) say the paradox simply shows limits to human logic when applied to infinite concepts.

    Conclusion

    Thus, we see that paradoxes are puzzles without a clearcut solutions. They appear in Logic, Philosophy, Physics, Psychology, and Theology, resulting in unending struggles and discussions that sometimes result in the discovery of new ideas and theories, which help in the progression of human civilization. That is all for this blog. Please like, comment, share, and subscribe if you enjoyed it. Thank You.

    Suggested Readings


    Disclosure: This post contains affiliate links. As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases. I only recommend books I truly value.